Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

How do we think about cancel culture? Show more Show less

In June 2020, cancel culture claimed its latest victim: the popular children's television show Paw Patrol. It was claimed that its protagonists - animated dogs who operate as police in a fictional universe - were being derided. These pieces said critics saw its positive portrayal of law enforcement strengthened a culture of deference to the police. Headlines around the world stated cancel culture had gone mad. But none of this was true. What began as a joke about cancel culture had grown into a conspiracy tearing across the internet. This crisis underpinned the bigger picture: anyone can be cancelled, and it has gone so far it can reach the international news without questioning. In recent years, the practice of withdrawing support for public figures who hold controversial views has exploded. And not just amongst the cartoons. Michael Jackson, JK Rowling, Louis CK, Woody Allen: the list of its celebrity victims is growing. The boom has divided opinion. Some believe it is a form of online activism that helps the marginalised hold the powerful to account. Their opponents see it as a devastating attack on civil liberties. So, who are these groups, what do they stand for, and why?

"Cancel culture is critical for democracy!" Show more Show less

This approach argues that cancel culture empowers marginalised groups. It understands that society is built in institutionalised hierarchies that cut across social identities. The de-platforming of offensive views is therefore an important type of activism. Cancel culture has become an important tool to redress these inequalities.
(1 of 3 Positions) Next >

Cancel culture is being weaponised by a privileged elite

Critics of cancel culture are largely made up of society's traditional beneficiaries: those in power. That is the white, wealthy, heterosexual man. Their hatred comes from a place of social insecurity and the fear that other groups will dethrone them. This group is predisposed to hate challenges to its authority. It is hardly surprising that it is the most vocal on this debate then, or that its damning view of cancel culture has bled so quickly into the mainstream.
< Previous (3 of 3 Arguments) Next >


The Argument

Counter arguments



Rejecting the premises


Further Reading


    Explore related arguments

    This page was last edited on Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 at 10:16 UTC