Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

Do human beings have free will? Show more Show less

Do we have control over our actions? If we do, what sort of control and to what extent? Free will is the power to act without the constraint of necessity or fate. It is the ability to act at one's own discretion. For centuries, people have wondered how freedom is possible in a world ruled by physical determinism. Reflections on free will have been confined to philosophy until half a century ago, when the topic started also to be seriously investigated by neuroscientists. Today, there are several irreconcilable positions about the existence of human free will.

No, people don't have free will Show more Show less

We can run from it, but the truth is that our actions are predetermined by a higher force than our selves.
< Previous (2 of 4 Positions) Next >

There is no escaping fate

Since the Ancient Greek story of Oedipus, there have been many who believe there is no escaping fate.
< Previous (1 of 2 Arguments) Next >

Context

The Argument

The main challenge to free will is determinism: the view that everything that happens (human decisions and actions included) is the consequence of sufficient conditions for its occurrence. Often people who say they believe in free will usually also believe that every event has a cause. There are many types of determinism such as genetic, theological and causal. Causal determinism means that as a physical being in a physical universe the ways things interact are in accord with set physical laws.[1] Theological determinism argues that everything is destined occur in a certain way because that is God’s will. Hard determinism is the belief that all events are caused by past events and that nothing other than what does occur can occur.[2] In the 18th century, hard determinist Baron D’Holbach said that everything is part of a chain – the inevitable result of what came before including everything we do.[3] Therefore, people have no freedom and no choice.[1] Every event is caused by a previous event and people can never do anything apart from what they did. Therefore, they are never free. Although we can not pinpoint the exact factors that led us to an action, we could in theory isolate them if we knew enough about all the beliefs, desires and temperaments swirling around in our brains. Decisions are the result of a combination of mental processes that come together in a specific way so that whatever choice of action is made, the result is ‘fixed in stone.’ The German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer said, and Einstein paraphrased, that “a human can very well do what he wants, but cannot will what he wants.”[4]

Counter arguments

Framing

Premises

[P1] Everything is a result of what came before. [P2] Therefore, all action is predetermined by what came before it. [P3] Therefore, there is no real free will.

Rejecting the premises

Proponents

Further Reading

Guolipour, B. (2019) A Famous Argument Against Free Will Has Been Debunked. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/09/free-will-bereitschaftspotential/597736/ Kane, R. (2016). The complex tapestry of free will: striving will, indeterminism and volitional streams. Synthese 1–16. Lavazza, A., and Inglese, S. (2015). Operationalizing and measuring (a kind of) free will (and responsibility). Towards a new framework for psychology, ethics and law. Riv. Int. di Filos. e Psicol. 6, 37–55. doi: 10.4453/rifp.2015.0004 Nahmias, E. (2014). “Is free will an illusion? Confronting challenges from the modern mind sciences,” in Moral Psychology, Vol. 4, Free Will and Moral Responsibility, ed. W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), 1–26. Overbye, D. (2007) Free Will: Now You Have It, Now You Don’t. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/02/science/02free.html Schurger, A., Mylopoulos, M., and Rosenthal, D. (2016). Neural antecedents of spontaneous voluntary movement: a new perspective. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 77–79. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.11.003 Trevena, J., and Miller, J. (2010). Brain preparation before a voluntary action: evidence against unconscious movement initiation. Conscious. Cogn. 19, 447–456. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.006 Wegner, D. M. (2002). The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Wegner, D. M. (2003). The mind’s best trick: how we experience conscious will. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 65–69. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00002-0 Wegner, D. M. (2004). Précis of the illusion1 of conscious will. Behav. Brain Sci. 27, 649–659. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X04000159

References

  1. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00262/full
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCGtkDzELAI
  3. https://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/philosophers/dholbach/
  4. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/02/science/02free.html

Explore related arguments

This page was last edited on Tuesday, 21 Apr 2020 at 08:41 UTC