Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

What are the options on a second Brexit referendum? Show more Show less

Theresa May’s Brexit deal contains little to please Brexiteers or Remainers. As it stands, it will be very difficult for Brexit to end in a way that is satisfying for anyone. Should there be a second referendum on Brexit, so that people can vote with a better understanding of their options?

It is an irrelevant debate Show more Show less

It is a pointless debate because we can't have a second referendum.
< Previous (2 of 6 Positions) Next >

We don’t have time for a second Brexit referendum

It is a pointless debate because we don’t have time for a second referendum before the Article 50 deadline.
< Previous (2 of 2 Arguments)

Context

On March 29th, 2017, Theresa May triggered Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. Under the terms of the treaty, this gave the UK two years to leave the European Union. The deadline is March 29th,2019.

The Argument

This deadline does not leave enough time stage a second referendum. The bill for the first referendum took seven months to pass. Although the process could likely be expedited this time around given that many of the logistical arrangements would remain the same from 2016, this still leaves the UK with an unrealistically short time span to organise a national referendum.[1] Parliament has to pass a bill calling for the referendum, then the Electoral Commission has to assess and approve the wording of the question. British law also requires a ten-week campaigning period before a referendum can be held. This is not feasible in the short timeframe.[2] A report from the Constitution Unit at University College London analysed the mechanics of holding a second referendum and concluded that even in a best-case scenario, the government would need 22 weeks to implement a second referendum. There are less than 22 weeks left before the deadline.[3]

Counter arguments

There is no legal precedent for the Article 50 deadline. No nation has triggered it before. Nor has any nation left the EU before. Therefore, the deadline is more flexible than many believe. The UK could negotiate an extension with the EU. If the EU believes that a second referendum may be on the cards it should be amenable to the idea, especially if the option to remain in the EU is on the ballot, given it wants the UK to remain in the union.[4]

Framing

Premises

The Article 50 deadline for Britain to leave the EU is at the end of March. There is not enough time to hold a second referendum before the deadline.

Rejecting the premises

The UK can ask Europe for an extension on the deadline.

Proponents

Do you agree?

Sign up or log in to record your thoughts on this argument.

Further Reading

References

  1. https://www.economist.com/britain/2018/07/19/a-second-brexit-referendum-is-back-in-play
  2. https://www.ft.com/content/b17ff2b6-cd45-11e8-9fe5-24ad351828ab
  3. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/publications/tabs/unit-publications/The_Mechanics_of_a_Further_Referendum_on_Brexit
  4. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/there-will-be-no-second-brexit-referendum-33837

Explore related arguments

This page was last edited on Monday, 20 Jan 2020 at 09:20 UTC