Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

How do we think about the UK lockdown debate? Show more Show less

The coronavirus pandemic has led to unprecedented isolation measures throughout the world. One effect has been the creation of ideological blocs across traditional party lines, lobbying for different approaches to containing the virus. UK lockdown came into effect on March 23, shutting down non-essential business and movement outside the home, bar a single daily outing for exercise. Critics variously describe this decision as too late, too little, too much and overblown. So, who are these groups, what do they stand for, and why?

The libertarian position, or 'End lockdown now!' Show more Show less

At the heart of this approach is the belief that lockdown is a violation of fundamental human rights. Its proponents range from the UK alt right, to high court judges, to commentators seeing the closure of British drinking holes as a bleak symbol of authoritarian rule.
< Previous (3 of 5 Positions) Next >

Lockdown puts us on the path to totalitarian rule

Advocates point to Hungarian Premier Orban’s seizure of state machinery during the crisis, as an example of what’s to come if lockdown remains. This group considers lockdown a form of latent despotism that will threaten civil liberties in the post-pandemic world. Proponents include former Supreme Court Justice Lord Sumption and Daily Mail columnist Peter Hitchens.
< Previous (6 of 8 Arguments) Next >
cover despotism lockdown

Context

The Argument

Giving governments the opportunity to control their citizens will lead to despotism. Power begets power. [1]

Counter arguments

Framing

Premises

Rejecting the premises

Proponents

Further Reading

References

  1. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/columnist-224/Peter-Hitchens-The-Mail-Sunday.html

Explore related arguments

This page was last edited on Tuesday, 5 May 2020 at 19:54 UTC