Are nations ancient or modern? Are they natural or artificial? Are they a tool of liberation or coercion? Despite many predicting globalisation would make them obsolete, nations are now back in fashion in a world where leaders tout America First, the Great Rejuvenation of the Chinese People, and Hindutva. Understanding the nation now seems more important than ever.
Nations are natural communitiesShow moreShow less
Modern nations reflect long existing human communities who display a basic unity over a continuous historical period.
Originating with Herder is the idea that mankind is divided into a variety of distinct incommensurable cultural communities. The idea has proved very influential and to this day many assume nations are, and should be, based on cultural unity.
Nations are long-existing communities of people whose unity has been sustained by a shared cultural heritage. This heritage might include language, religion, myths and legends, cultural artefacts and value systems.
Modern ethno-symbolist theory sees cultural unity as being based on a common set of inherited myths and symbols. These form the basis of a common set of beliefs and values about the world and shared reference point for all members of the cultural community.
Nations are merely a modern expression of this ancient sense of cultural community.
Many modern nations contain a variety of different cultural groups and are nations nonetheless.
Those nations which are culturally homogeneous only became so thanks to sustained political and governmental action to promote a particular national culture. Evidence of pre-modern cultural homogeneity is very thin.
[P1] There exist long standing coherent and distinctive cultural communities.
[P2] These cultural communities are the natural basis from which people organise themselves socially.
Rejecting the premises
[Rejecting P1] Many modern nations are not culturally homogeneous so cannot be said to be built on cultural unity.
[Rejecting P2] National homogeneity is rarely natural.