Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

Should corporal punishment be allowed? Show more Show less

Corporal punishment - state sanctioned physical punishment - has been banned in 58 countries worldwide. However, some argue these bans deter violent crime. Should corporal punishment be allowed? Can it be an effective disciplinary tool? Or is it linked to skyrocketing crime rates?

Corporal punishment is sometimes acceptable Show more Show less

Corporal punishment should only be used in very specific scenarios.
< Previous (3 of 3 Positions)

Only when the offender knows right from wrong

Corporal punishment can only be effective if the perpetrator consciously chose to break the law.
< Previous (1 of 2 Arguments) Next >

Context

For corporal punishment to be effective, the recipient must understand right from wrong. Otherwise, they will not be able to make the connection between their actions and the consequence.

The Argument

The benefits of corporal punishment are lost when it is administered to those that cannot fully grasp the idea of right and wrong. For it to have any impact, the child or adult must have known that their action was wrong and done it anyway. Unless this criterion is met, it should not be used. In the past, corporal punishment has been deployed against children with mental disabilities and behavioural disorders. In these cases, it has no effect beyond making their lives unbearable. They will not modify their behaviour and corporal punishment becomes cruel and unethical.

Counter arguments

Framing

Premises

[P1] To change someone's behaviour they must know the difference between the right and wrong behaviour. [P2] If they don't it cannot be changed. [P3] The purpose of corporal punishment is to change behaviour patterns. [P4] Therefore, corporal punishment can only be effective on those that already know right from wrong.

Rejecting the premises

Proponents

Further Reading

References

    Explore related arguments

    This page was last edited on Friday, 21 Feb 2020 at 11:26 UTC