Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

Should the Monarchy be Abolished? Show more Show less

The Royal Family is a pillar in the British cultural and political landscape. The country tunes in for their weddings, places bets on their baby names and earnestly discusses their wardrobe choices. Given the monarchy's diminished role in politics, is it time to get rid of the royals? Or do they still serve a purpose in modern society?

Yes: we should abolish the monarchy Show more Show less

The monarchy is an outdated and problematic institution
(1 of 3 Positions) Next >>

The monarchy is wasting valuable taxpayer money

Given limited government budgets, we shouldn't be spending millions on the royal family.

(1 of 3 Arguments) Next >>
Tax Government Waste


Harry and Meghan's wedding cost £30 million. The amount of money we spend maintaining the lavish lifestyles of the Royals has far better uses.

The Argument

Given limited government funds, we should not be spending taxpayer money on an elite group of individuals who contribute very little to the country. The Royal family are a net drain on public finances that is taking money away from more important causes. The money spent flying the Queen around the world can provide free school meals or repave country roads. While the Family does bring in money by attracting tourists, the historic locations will continue bringing in visitors regardless of who lives there. Buckingham Palace and Windsor castle will continue to be important landmarks that people will want to see, much like the Versailles continues to be receive thousands or visitors despite no royalty living there for generations.

Counter arguments

The Royal family brings in more money than it spends through tourism. Its existence sells merchandise, creates an invaluable marketing tool and creates a buzz around the nation in general. The Royal Finances are transparent and accountable. This means that excess spending will likely be caught and prevented. If the Monarchy isn't actually a substantial drain on public finances, and brings in other substantial diplomatic, PR and soft-power benefits, we have no reason to abolish it.


1. Spending large amounts of limited public funds should be justified by a large amount of benefit for the British public. 2. The Royal family is a net drain on public funds. 3. The Royal family does not create a proportionate benefit for the British public. 4. Therefore we shouldn't spend money on the Monarchy, and it should be abolished.

Rejecting the premises

2. The Royal family is a net drain on public funds The counterargument contests the factual truth of this statement. Most sources show that the Family is self-sustaining and actually brings benefits to the British economy


Content references here ...


Do you agree?

Sign up or log in to record your thoughts on this argument

Explore related arguments

This page was last edited on Friday, 17 Jan 2020 at 09:54 UTC