Although Amnesty International defines individuals being able to make choices about their own bodies as a "basic human right",
there is a long history of the state trying to restrict what women can and cannot do with their bodies, through laws pertaining to abortion, marriage, sex and assault. By criminalising prostitution, the state is once again trying to take control of women's bodies away from women.
The concern regarding prostitution should centre on whether women entering prostitution have ample choices. As Goodyear and Cusick state, "remedies for social issues surrounding prostitution lie not in legislative measures but in social determinants that limit women's choices, such as wage disparities, access to welfare, and domestic violence."
Avenues for choice should not be taken away, but measures should instead be taken to ensure the most marginalised have more choices so are not forced into any one profession.
The idea that people in sex work are incapable of choosing to be there is belittling. People should have the autonomy to choose what profession they work in. As long as both parties are consenting adults, there is no reason that sex workers should not have the freedom to do the work they want to do. Sex work is a valid choice and one that individuals should have the right to choose.
People who subscribe to this argument are likely to also believe that:
- Abortion is an individual choice 
- Surrogacy is about a woman's body, her rules and her choice 
- Human rights should be inalienable.