Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

Who was Shakespeare? Show more Show less

"What's in a name?" one of Shakespeare's star-crossed lovers asked. When it comes to the identity of the greatest writer in the English language, a great deal. That mantle has long been bestowed on a glover's son from Stratford-Upon-Avon. But since the 19th century, there have been doubts over William Shakespeare's identity as the writer of the works attributed to the playwright. Was the Bard from Stratford a front for another writer? Was he just one participant in a collective group of writers? Or was he a she?

William Shakespeare was a woman Show more Show less

'He' was a 'She', something not often discussed.
< Previous (3 of 5 Positions) Next >

Shakespeare had a hidden code

Shakespeare's use of feminine endings reveals a female author trying to include subtle hints at her gender.
< Previous (4 of 5 Arguments) Next >

Context

Shakespeare employs feminine endings (a verse’s ending with an unstressed, hypermetric syllable) to provide rhythm and flow to his prose. These endings are gradually employed with more frequency in his writing. In his early work, they feature in under 10% of his written prose. Then they increase to around 20%. After 1600, they jump to over 25% of his writing, peaking at 35.4% of verses in the Tempest.[1]

The Argument

This was deliberately done to ensure that ensuing generations cracked the cypher and identified Shakespeare as the female writer she was. The increased frequency of the feminine ending was the author's way of trying to get the message across to the unsuspecting public without actually putting the fact in black and white.

Counter arguments

This 'hidden code' is not a code at all but a writing style. The fact that Shakespeare frequently employs feminine endings to his verse is no more evidence of him being a woman than Herman Melville's frequent use of the word 'whale' in his prose is evidence that he is actually a whale.

Framing

Premises

[P1] Shakespeare's use of female endings was not typical for written works at the time. [P2] The author used it with increased frequency in later plays. [P3] This was a hint to readers that the author was, in fact, female.

Rejecting the premises

[Rejecting P3] This is not evidence of anything.

Proponents

Further Reading

References

  1. https://www.jstor.org/stable/372745?read-now=1&seq=4#page_scan_tab_contents

Explore related arguments

This page was last edited on Monday, 20 Jan 2020 at 09:52 UTC