Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

Should electronic identities be managed by the state? Show more Show less

The management of electronic identities (credentials for accessing state services) should not be sub-contracted to external entities. Electronic identities should be private.

Yes, electronic identities should be managed by the state Show more Show less

State should not sub-contract this activity
(1 of 2 Positions) Next >

Only state can ensure correctness of data

(1 of 2 Arguments) Next >

Context

The Argument

An electronic ID will soon become the equivalent of a paper document (passport, ID cards). Only state has the required access to information to ensure identity and its requirements.

Counter arguments

The state can alwasy keep a siupervising role (e.g. validate the identity) while the practical/logistic aspects to a sub-contractor.

Framing

Premises

1. Only the state has the required data that allow to validate the correctness of data (with-date, residence,..) 2. Only the state has the authorithy to prevent or limit the usage of electronic-ID for criminals.

Rejecting the premises

1. A sub-contractor can always request a state organization to validate the data. 2. The state can always exercise a veto for legal/public security reasons.

Proponents

Further Reading

References

    Explore related arguments

    This page was last edited on Tuesday, 25 Feb 2020 at 22:03 UTC