Post-9/11, there was a sharp increase in the amount that ordinary citizens are watched by the state. Rapidly progressing technologies mean that it is possible to track and watch people like never before. While supporters argue that this is a small price to pay for increased safety and the prevention of terrorism, others claim that increased surveillance is a serious contravention of human rights. Is the way we are now constantly surveilled a step too far?
No, surveillance has not gone too far
There are many benefits to high levels of surveillance - it keeps the country safe.
It has proven useful internationally
A worldwide surveillance system allows us to track illegal activity much quicker across borders.Explore
Surveillance keeps us safe
Surveillance prevents the worst criminal activity.Explore
Taking away surveillance is taking away jobs
A wide range of people have careers in surveillance. If surveillance was decreased, many people would lose their jobs.Explore
Yes, surveillance has gone too far.
The cons are greater than the pros, and is too much of a human rights contravention to be acceptable.
Surveillance technology is progressing too quickly
Today, there are many more types of surveillance than just cameras.Explore
Constant surveillance is a waste of resources
There are millions of cameras - and it takes a lot to control themExplore
Surveillance is an invasion of privacy
Surveillance usage makes the public feel unsafeExplore
Surveillance is being used as sole evidence
Good people are negatively affected by false judgements.Explore
It depends on the situation
Surveillance should only be used in situations where it is absolutely necessary.
Surveillance should only be used for crime
Surveillance keeps the good guys innocent and is crucial for catching criminalsExplore
This page was last edited on Friday, 27 Mar 2020 at 14:06 UTC