Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

Should we boycott Facebook because of Cambridge Analytica? Show more Show less

Cambridge Analytica is a British political consulting firm. In March, allegations broke that CA obtained private information from an estimated 50 million Facebook users without their permission. This data was then shared with third parties, including Donald Trump’s presidential campaign during the 2016 US Presidential Elections. The issue has raised concerns about privacy in the age of Big Data, and has sparked calls to increase the regulatory oversight over firms like Facebook.

Regulate Facebook Show more Show less

Like any other normal business that gets out of hand... Its time to regulate.
< Previous (2 of 3 Positions) Next >

Protect the public's data

In the same way that the European Union has begun to protect users' data rights with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), it is time for the US to regulate big tech as well. Data rights and privacy must be protected by the state.
< Previous (2 of 2 Arguments) Next >

Context

The Argument

A state can impose restrictions on social network that has become de-facto a public service. Imposing constraints on the usage by the company of personal data must be part of it.

Counter arguments

It is difficult to impose constraints on a global company. Regulations such as GDPR are restricted to European Community members. An organization can easily cricumvent such regulations for instance by relocating his head-quarter to a complacent country.

Framing

Premises

Rejecting the premises

Proponents

Further Reading

References

    Explore related arguments

    This page was last edited on Monday, 29 Jun 2020 at 19:00 UTC