Mapping the world's opinions

argument top image

How do we think about cancel culture? Show more Show less

In June 2020, cancel culture claimed its latest victim: the popular children's television show Paw Patrol. It was claimed that its protagonists - animated dogs who operate as police in a fictional universe - were being derided. These pieces said critics saw its positive portrayal of law enforcement strengthened a culture of deference to the police. Headlines around the world stated cancel culture had gone mad. But none of this was true. What began as a joke about cancel culture had grown into a conspiracy tearing across the internet. This crisis underpinned the bigger picture: anyone can be cancelled, and it has gone so far it can reach the international news without questioning. In recent years, the practice of withdrawing support for public figures who hold controversial views has exploded. And not just amongst the cartoons. Michael Jackson, JK Rowling, Louis CK, Woody Allen: the list of its celebrity victims is growing. The boom has divided opinion. Some believe it is a form of online activism that helps the marginalised hold the powerful to account. Their opponents see it as a devastating attack on civil liberties. So, who are these groups, what do they stand for, and why?

"Cancel culture must be cancelled!" Show more Show less

This approach argues that cancel culture exposes a crisis of individual liberty. It considers freedom of expression to be an inalienable right. Disagreement is being weaponised to silence those who hold unpopular views.
< Previous (3 of 3 Positions)

Cancel culture represents a crisis of free speech

The growth of cancel culture goes hand in hand with the shrinking of free expression. Where it once existed to shut down extremism or ideas that incited dangerous behaviours, it now exists in the mainstream. It has become a form of "viewpoint discrimination" in which those that really suffer at its hands are ordinary people. The research backs this up. A 2018 McLaughlin and Associates poll revealed that 54% of American undergraduates felt too intimidated to share their opinions, for fear of being cancelled. This was a 9% increase from the year before. It is transforming the way that the individual perceives and expresses agency within a society, and encouraging a monoculture of opinion. Proponents include University of Pennsylvania Education Professor Jonathan Zimmerman.
< Previous (6 of 8 Arguments) Next >

Context

The Argument

Counter arguments

Framing

Premises

Rejecting the premises

Proponents

Further Reading

References

    Explore related arguments

    This page was last edited on Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 at 10:08 UTC